Analysing
Previous Student Work
Name of Magazine
|
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
Grade I
awarded and reason |
IMAGE
|
The
design of the pull-quote is professional and unique. The house style colours
are consistent – it stands out. The images and logo used are very
professional and not pixelated. The photoshop/editing on the images is
professional looking. The density of
the font is good. The contrasting colours on the contents page look
professional.
|
The
cover line colour clashes against the red lines in the background. The “Scan
box” looks out of place – it would have looked better on the contents page.
The font is almost “too standard” in the article. The main image on the cover
has shadows that seem unnatural. Bad grammar has been used in the double page
spread. The background colour on the contents page is too bold – texture
could have been added. There is no anchor on the double page spread – readers
wouldn’t know what the image is/who the image is of.
|
B
|
Sound Check
|
The
photos used have been took at concerts and not taken from the internet. They
have included “posters” which are common in music magazines. Band logos have
been used. Anchors have been used for
the images.
|
The
photos are too dark – although being good shots of the band members.
The
photos used are quite dark which clashes with the grey and black house style
which makes the whole style seem bland. The text used in the contents page
and double page spread is too unprofessional. For the background of the
contents page and double page spread is just a block colour – texture could
be added to make it look more appealing. The page number is also incorrect for the
contents page and the numbers in the contents page are random.
|
C
|
Strobe
|
The
photographs used are good quality. Photoshop has been used effectively –
putting images in front of the text.
|
The
layout of the double page spread is pretty simplistic – the background
colours are completely bold which makes it look quite un-professional and not
very aesthetically pleasing. On the front cover, some of the text blends in
with the colour behind it which makes it hard to read and almost hurts the
eye when straining to read it. The white background could have a slight
texture to it to make it look less flat and more professional. The use of photoshop
on the front cover doesn’t look right – the blur tool used to create the
smoke effect.
|
C |
What have
I learned from looking at last year’s student work?
I
have learned that I need to pay close attention to photos that I take –
making sure that they are not blurry/out of focus. Also, I have learned that
attention to detail will increase how aesthetically pleasing. Using block
colours as backgrounds make the magazine look quite unprofessional, so I will
try to avoid doing that.
|
How will I
apply this to my own work?
I
will make sure that my photos look professional before creating my magazine –
if possible, using the studio when taking the photos. I will make sure that
to give my magazine more depth – aesthetically – I will not use block
colours, instead non-block colours – e.g shading.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment